Against Apologetcs

Against Apologetcs

 

 

 

viaAgainst Apologetcs.

 

viaAgainst Apologetcs.

viaAgainst Apologetcs.

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Debate Review: Greg Bahnsen vs. Gordon Stein

Originally posted on J.W. Wartick -"Always Have a Reason":

Advocates of the presuppositional approach to Christian Apologetics have long hailed the debate between Greg Bahnsen (the late Christian theologian and apologist, noted for his achievements in presuppositional apologetics and development of theonomy–a view of the Law for Christians, pictured left) and Gordon Stein (the late secularist noted for his links to Free Inquiry among other things, pictured below, right) as a stirring triumph of presuppositional apologetics over atheism in a point-by-point debate. Recently, I listened to the debate and thought I would share my impressions here.

Debate Outline

Bahnsen Opening Statement

From the outset, it was clear this debate was going to be different from others I’d listened to or watched. Bahnsen outlined what he means by “God,” outlined a few general points about subjectivism, and then quickly dove into a presuppositional type of argument. He began with an attack on the idea that all existential questions can be answered…

View original 2,210 more words

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

skepticgriggsy

skepticgriggsy

viaskepticgriggsy.

viaskepticgriggsy.

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

On the Five Ways

On the Five Ways.

viaOn the Five Ways.

Categories: Uncategorized | 2 Comments

That absurd relationship!

None need that absurd relationship with God!

Categories: Uncategorized | 1 Comment

lordgriggs:

Feser sure has that idiotic theology! He prefers teleology instead of what the pre-Socratics and modern science tell us pellucidly- no divine intent acts in or behind the Cosmos and thus no God for us! And per Reichenbach’s argument from Existence, it is all and thus no transcendent God can be and transcendence contradicts omnipresences, so He couldn’t God and again He cannot exist. Yes, theology is stupid to be blunt!

Originally posted on Fr. Griggs:

Neurath\’s Boat

viaNeurath\’s Boat.

View original

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

That’s theological babble. Prof. Irwin Corey makes more sense!
I agree with Flincke. Please subscribe to that worthy blog!

Categories: Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Reason against Religions!

Reason against Religions!

viaReason against Religions!.

viaReason against Religions!.

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

More theology enabling for nothing!

Categories: Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com. The Adventure Journal Theme.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.